REVIEWERS

 
All proposals undergo blind review. We greatly value the contribution that the blind review process makes in conference presentation selections and appreciate the time that our reviewers take from their busy schedule to assist us in our efforts to build a great program.

 

2020 Reviewers

 

We wish to take this opportunity to recognize and thank our 2020 Lilly-Austin reviewers:

 

Emtinan Alqurashi, Temple University 

Susan Archibald, Purdue University Global

Spencer Benson, University of Maryland

Stephen L. Bergstrom, Southern Alberta Institute of Technology

Julie Breitfelder, Gannon University

Chrystal Dean, Appalachian State University

Peter Eberle, Penn State University

Joshua May, Columbus State University

Sal Meyers, Simpson College

Barbara Mossber, Clark Honors College

Jennifer Moxley, Towson University

Kimberly Ondo, Purdue University Global

Timothy M. Ottusch, University of Arizona

Iglika Pavlova, University of North Carolina, Greensboro

Brian Smith, Graceland University

Michael Snell, Purdue University Global

Stacey Souther, Cuyahoga Community College

Virginia Uhley, Oakland University

Kimberly Van Orman, University at Albany, SUNY

Jakki Williams, North Carolina A&T State University

   

Invitation to Review

 

If you are interested in the opportunity to review proposals for the Lilly Conferences, click here to contact us. This obligation entails: reading 3-4 proposals, evaluating each using a given rubric, and making the recommendation that the proposal be A) accepted as submitted, B) accepted with revisions, or C) accepted in a different format than the author requested. If you have any questions about how the process works please do not hesitate to ask.

‚Äč

  • facebook-square
  • Twitter Square
  • LinkedIn Black Square