REVIEWERS
All proposals undergo blind review. We greatly value the contribution that the blind review process makes in conference presentation selections and appreciate the time that our reviewers take from their busy schedule to assist us in our efforts to build a great program.
2020 Reviewers
We wish to take this opportunity to recognize and thank our 2020 Lilly-Austin reviewers:
Emtinan Alqurashi, Temple University
Susan Archibald, Purdue University Global
Spencer Benson, University of Maryland
Stephen L. Bergstrom, Southern Alberta Institute of Technology
Julie Breitfelder, Gannon University
Chrystal Dean, Appalachian State University
Peter Eberle, Penn State University
Joshua May, Columbus State University
Sal Meyers, Simpson College
Barbara Mossber, Clark Honors College
Jennifer Moxley, Towson University
Kimberly Ondo, Purdue University Global
Timothy M. Ottusch, University of Arizona
Iglika Pavlova, University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Brian Smith, Graceland University
Michael Snell, Purdue University Global
Stacey Souther, Cuyahoga Community College
Virginia Uhley, Oakland University
Kimberly Van Orman, University at Albany, SUNY
Jakki Williams, North Carolina A&T State University
Invitation to Review
If you are interested in the opportunity to review proposals for the Lilly Conferences, click here to contact us. This obligation entails: reading 3-4 proposals, evaluating each using a given rubric, and making the recommendation that the proposal be A) accepted as submitted, B) accepted with revisions, or C) accepted in a different format than the author requested. If you have any questions about how the process works please do not hesitate to ask.